Specific Guidelines
Scope and Alignment
Abstracts are recommended to align with the HS Foundation’s Research Roadmap, supporting the transformation of healthcare in Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
Abstract Length and Language
- Abstracts must not exceed 300 words in length, excluding the title and author list.
- Abstracts will only be accepted in English.
Title and Authorship Requirements
- Abstract titles may contain a maximum of 100 characters.
- Titles must use upper and lower case and should not be in all capital letters.
- There is no limit on the number of authors per abstract.
Topic Categorization
During submission, authors will be asked to categorize their abstract under one of the following topics:
- Basic Science, Translational Research, Pathogenesis & Genetics;
- Epidemiology and Comorbidities;
- Medical & Surgical Treatments (Clinical studies or trials that evaluate or compare medical therapies, surgery, devices, or other interventions for the treatment of HS);
- Patient-Centered Care, Delivery, and Access to Care, Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes;
- Case Report & Case Series (Only considered for poster/e-poster presentation)
Presentation Preference
- Authors must indicate whether they prefer oral or poster presentation.
- Abstracts with a preference for oral presentation may be reassigned to poster presentation if oral placement is not available.
- Abstracts submitted for poster presentation will not be considered for oral presentation.
Required Abstract Structure
Each abstract should follow the following structure:
- Background: Summary of the rationale for the work.
- Objective: Clearly state the purpose of the work.
- Method: Describe the procedures/activities or methodology used to conduct your work. Please provide specific Information about subject characteristics or healthcare setting, where relevant.
- Results: Summarize key findings or important results that you wish to share with colleagues in a clear and concise manner. Where results warrant, provide reasonable conclusions that relate back to the study purpose/objectives.
- Discussion: Clearly state how the outcomes and potential applications are pertinent to the audience.
Evaluation Criteria
All abstracts will be peer-reviewed using the following criteria:
Originality
- Novelty of the concept, approach, or analysis.
- Innovation in addressing new or existing research questions.
Significance & Scientific Merit
- Importance of the work within its subject area.
- Potential to improve understanding, diagnosis, treatment, or outcomes in HS.
- Relevance and interest to the anticipated audience.
Experimental Design
- Appropriateness of the study design and methodology.
- Validity and application of statistical measures, where applicable.
- Consideration of confounding variables and strength of conclusions.
Overall Quality and Presentation
- Organization, clarity, and readability.
- Ability to engage the reader and clearly convey conclusions.
- Writing quality, including grammar and spelling.